Strictly not for the birds

I posted this on another blog in 2002:

In 1999, as an intern training at the editorial office of The Week in Kochi, I came to be known as the Birdman thanks to a feature on Kashmir’s Dal Lake that I had to rewrite. I peppered the piece with pintails, garganey and shovellers, adding colour and cackle to what arrived on the desk as a pretty drab report.

It never occurred to me that the news of my skills would be tom-tommed all the way to the sacred cabins of the top brass.

One day a senior editor came up to my workstation, and bent down sheepishly for a seemingly conspiratorial exchange.

“Do ducks have pricks?” he hissed.

“No,” I said, inadvertently mimicking his whisper, and pretending to conceal my shock.

“Then how do they do it?” he asked incredulously.

“Birds belong to Class Aves, they have no external genitalia,” I said, trying in vain not to sound professorial. “Both sexes have a cloacal aperture, which is differentiated internally. Often the male may have cloacal spurs to secure the moment of contact.”

“Which means…”

“Which means ‘sex’ between birds is merely cloacal contact,” I said, shrugging.

“Oh…” he said, his face betraying great dismay.

“Yes, sir,” I empathized. “The joys of intercourse, more specifically intromission, are strictly not for the birds.”

UPDATE:

The beloved bird scientist Gopi Sundar updates me thus:

Ducks are among the few aves who have semi-pricks

swans have slightly bigger ones
🙂
Beej
Newsletter signup

It's more fun when you subscribe.
Great content. Zero spam. And your data stays safe. Promise!

Newsletter signup

It's more fun when you subscribe.
Great content. Zero spam. And your data stays safe. Promise!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.